Since last November
many of us in many places in the US have heightened dreams of secession, of new
nation-states, new sovereignty. It is true that many of us have had less
intense versions of that fantasy for decades, waxing and waning from regime to
regime.
Now it's approaching
heart-attack serious.
Trump is a daily
embarrassment; worse, he gets to use the fruits of our labor to carry out
disgusting policies, drop the Mother of All Bombs on Afghanistan, likely pay
for a cruel and retro-minded border wall with Mexico, and possibly even wage
nuclear war with North Korea. He seeks to gain more personal wealth on the
backs of poor people daily, he insults the victims of anthropogenically
worsened climate disasters in the Caribbean, and is simply insufferable in his
tone-deaf narcissism, adolescent braggadocio, and trailer-trash personal
insults.
One of my Vermont
friends sent me notice that she has joined a group there calling themselves
Most Likely to Secede. Some in the Upper Great Lakes region are reviving ideas
of Miniwishigan, a nation-state of the US side of the Lake Superior basin. Increasingly,
Native Americans are discussing stronger sovereignty, often in broad
multi-tribal coalitions.
Here in the Pacific
Northwest we refer to it as Cascadia. We even have our own flag, the beautiful
Douglas Fir. We envision ourselves as Washington, Oregon, and northern
California. We may need to reassess if eastern Washington and eastern Oregon
prove to be Trump loyalists, essentially artifacts from the racist white
homeland some wished for the Pacific Northwest from time to time. Maybe we are
mostly coastal. And of course there are some serious Jeffersonians in a
particular part of northern California, but they may or may not be amenable to a racially, religiously, ethnically diverse
and eco-friendly vision for Cascadia. Let them secede in their own way or join
us with forward thinking, not backward.
So, as you may
imagine, we love the serious struggle by Catalonians for their independence.
They clearly want it even more than Puerto Ricans or Scots, voting to remain
part of the US and the UK respectively in 2017 and 2014. Puerto Rico voted to become a state and against independence; Scotland voted to remain a
junior partner in the UK. I wonder if those peoples are regretting their votes?
Gandhi once told the
British (paraphrase), We would rather
govern ourselves poorly than have you rule us efficiently. This is a
sentiment held by many people worldwide, though when the voting chips are down,
the blandishments of the hegemon often prevail. I am not suggesting that if we
held a vote in Cascadia we would do as well as Catalonia, but as Trump
alienates and makes us all roll our eyes and shake our heads, perhaps the
potential vote is growing closer.
Of course the other
North American secession movements are irredentist First Nation and Native
American struggles to regain complete nation-state sovereignty, not the limited
"trust relationship" sovereignty of the tribes to the US government
nor the more advanced but still unsatisfactory relationship of the Anishinaabeg to the government of Canada or the provincial
government of Manitoba.
The UN is a hostile
environment for most secession movements since it is a composition of some 194
nation-states in a world that the anthropologists tell us used to be at least
800 distinct nations with sovereignty and their own lands, a natural world
turned violently into the colonial system driven by European colonial powers
for half a millennium, with new national borders crunching peoples together or
splitting them apart in ways they well remember and generally regret. The UN's
members, thus, do not favor setting precedent by approving of secession when
they often harbor groups who would love to rule themselves too.
Indeed, even the EU is
not friendly to secession movements and said so publicly following the Catalan
vote. This was a great blow and disappointment to the Catalonians who voted,
some say in excess of 90 percent, for complete autonomy, independence, and
separate nation-state status from Spain. Of course this picture is blotched by
the Spanish police, who were ordered to prevent the independence vote, who
attacked voters and injured nearly 900 of them, and who confiscated ballot
boxes. How can accurate results obtain from such brutality, such a quash of
indigenous democracy?
Are voters intimidated
at times so severely that they simply stay away, thus compromising the results?
It is hard to say with Puerto Rico, since the vote was not taken seriously by
the US government and a mere 23 percent of eligible voters actually cast ballots. But in Catalonia the Spanish
government was dead serious and hyper-involved, possibly deterring a hefty
percentage of potential voters by beating those who showed up at the polls and
by blatantly seizing ballot boxes. Still, some 42 percent of registered voters did so.
So we shall see, here
and abroad. Trump's base includes many from states that attempted to secede and
became the Confederacy, and the rest of us know it. More and more, we want less
and less to do with him, with them, and possibly declaring our independence,
our sovereignty, is the solution.
No comments:
Post a Comment